Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 116 (0.03 seconds)

A. vs B. on 27 August, 1980

written statement Ex. 3 that he is not impotent and denied that he had no sexual relations with the petitioner. According ... capable of having sexual relation and intentionally desists front doing so. Mr. Khatri, therefore, urged that though on proof of impotence of respondent
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kathiresan vs Gowri on 3 August, 2021

suppressed by her parents. The respondent had not consummated due to the impotent, strange and bizzare conduct, erratic behaviour of her during the nuptial night ... respondent. Thereafter, the respondent's parents came to Pondicherry with other relatives and took her from the petitioner's home to their house
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

Renu Vij vs Surinder Kumar on 21 May, 1985

together as a husband and wife does not mean and include marital relations as a necessary ingredient. It is the factum of the residence together ... this case is living together as husband and wife without having conjugal relations. There are provisions in the Act to seek annulment of the marriage
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next