Appellant. The appellant urges infertility confusing the same with
impotence. Naturally there were physical relations between them
but the respondent was unable to conceive ... problems with lubrication. If the
appellant considered the respondent impotent unable to have
physical relations it was a fact especially in his knowledge. The
onus
came to know
that her husband is impotent. The prosecutrix alleges that she
was asked by the relatives of the husband not to disclose this
presence of his friends and
relatives, that her behavior towards the relatives was not good, as she never
served water etc. to guests and lastly ... petition, that the appellant alleged him to be impotent person
in the presence of relatives. This assertion was supported by him while
appearing
returned to matrimonial
home. Her relations with the husband were strained. The allegation of
impotency cannot be countenanced since at the time o death
relations. This, however, did not mean that she did not have any intercourse or that her marriage was not consummated because she was impotent ... Judge to come to the conclusion that the Appellant was impotent or was impotent qua the Respondent and that marriage had not been consummated
impotence. He failed to
have sexual intercourse with her despite all best co-operation provided by
her to the appellant-husband for establishing sexual relations ... years. Though she
made efforts on various occasions to establish the sexual relation with the
appellant-husband but he could not succeed. It was only
meted out by the
appellant to the respondenthusband and the
illicit relations with his cousin.
Ultimately, in the reply/written statement
the respondent prayed ... further alleged that the
respondent is impotent. In the cross
examination the appellant admitted her
illicit relation with Rashmin (cousin
brother of the respondent
other relatives. She was even given inhuman treatment and was also tortured and given beatings many times. In fact, Bhupinder Singh was impotent and unable ... appears that on account of strained relations between the husband and wife and the impotency attributed to Bhupinder Singh, the petitioner has implicated
marriage the first
accused and his relative suppressed the fact that the first
accused was impotent and concealing the said fact the
first accused entered ... facts with respect to the so called
impotency of A1 and the harassment to any of her
relatives at the relevant point of time. During
complainant discovered that her
husband is an impotent. To avoid any type of physical relation with
the complainant, her husband used to quarrel with
