husband, the allegation of impotency
was disclosed not only before him, but also before
relatives of both parties, which caused lot of
embarrassment ... competency
5
to lead marital life and that he might be an impotent
person incompetent to lead marital life. It is further
averred that
relations of respondent No.1 (appellant-
wife) and respondent No.2.
The respondent-husband appeared as PW6 and gave details of
the illicit relations ... family members. She kept on saying respondent-husband as
Namard (impotent) and had illicit relations with respondent No.2. On
account of extreme mental cruelty
wife denied physical relations with the
appellant on the ground of illness as also on the ground of appellant
being impotent. Upon being asked ... made physical relations with the respondent and stated that the wife
and her family members have victimized him as impotent. Amulya
Ratan
husband's
impotency. The respondent/wife did not adduce any medical evidence or
by examining doctor to prove the impotency of the husband ... physically incapable of having sexual
relation with the respondent/wife and she found the appellant was
impotent and unable to discharge his marital obligations
father-in-law made propaganda that she had blamed
husband as impotent. As there was no other go, she had issued
legal notice, dated ... mother have started propaganda among
friends and relations at Guntur, that the respondent is impotent.
The petitioner's mother speaks values and insults
public bone
3) Disfigured private part area and left thigh
4) Impotency
5) Restricted movements at right hip and left knee.
6) Not able ... determining probable loss of earning capacity. A
person's impotency would have no relation to his ability to earn
income. This argument is, therefore
petitioner has submitted
that the respondent is impotent and she is unable to have
physical relation with the plaintiff.
Patna High Court C.Misc
never any physical relations
between them. She questioned her husband, but he mislead her. That her
husband was treated for impotency. However, he blamed ... harass the entire family. It
is pointed out that husband was not impotent and there is medical record to
that extent. According to her, respondent
prosecutrix had voluntarily entered into
physical relation with the petitioner for the reason that her husband is
impotent - a fact which she has admitted during
husband has refused to have physical relations
with her. She has nowhere stated that her husband is impotent. Thus, filing of
application for conducting virginity
