Sakshi. When he went to his matrimonial home, he was informed that relatives of Sakshi have gathered at the house of her Mama, Munna ... against her husband as alleged in the FIR that he was impotent. Her relatives may have taunted him. There is no material on record
wanted to
humiliate him in front of family and relatives by showing that he is
impotent.
5. On 24.05.2008, the appellant's mother gifted ... impotent.
8. Further stated that on 22.02.2008, after returning from birthday party
of appellant's cousin, the appellant wanted to have physical relations with
friends, officials of the petitioner, colleagues and relatives
making false allegations against him alleging that
petitioner is impotent. Though she knew that petitioner ... incompetent to perform the
matrimonial obligations and he is an impotent. Though
impotency is not a ground set up by the respondent-wife
started proclaiming openly that
the petitioner is impotent, she never allowed the
friends and relatives of the petitioner to visit the
matrimonial home and those ... impotent laid down that the wife
42
has not led any evidence to prove that the husband is
actually impotent. Under such circumstances, mental
cruelty
that her marriage with the respondent
is not consummated owing to the impotence of
the respondent?
5
UDPR ... would be relevant to go through the settled case
law relating to the impotency to appreciate the case facts.
6
UDPR
respondent
was harassing A1 by calling him as impotent person in front of his
relatives and also harassed the petitioners
cousin
Nandhini, complained to the relatives about the husband and his parents.
She also proclaimed that the husband was impotent thereby causing severe
embrassment
Thakurpada, Harichandanpur in presence of
their friends and relatives. It is also submitted that due to
impotency of the Opposite Party, their marriage could
that the A1 is
impotent. The 2nd respondent requested the Family Court to grant
divorce on the basis of impotency ... respondent or any of the relatives of the 2nd respondent that A1 was
impotent. However the criminal complaint reads that for the reason
of demand
that the A1 is
impotent. The 2nd respondent requested the Family Court to grant
divorce on the basis of impotency ... respondent or any of the relatives of the 2nd respondent that A1 was
impotent. However the criminal complaint reads that for the reason
of demand
