Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

this Court. It is submitted that because of the harassment, strained relations and impotency of the husband, the wife is undergoing tremendous stress

husband, the allegation of impotency was disclosed not only before him, but also before relatives of both parties, which caused lot of embarrassment ... competency 5 to lead marital life and that he might be an impotent person incompetent to lead marital life. It is further averred that

friends, officials of the petitioner, colleagues and relatives making false allegations against him alleging that petitioner is impotent. Though she knew that petitioner ... incompetent to perform the matrimonial obligations and he is an impotent. Though impotency is not a ground set up by the respondent-wife

started proclaiming openly that the petitioner is impotent, she never allowed the friends and relatives of the petitioner to visit the matrimonial home and those ... impotent laid down that the wife 42 has not led any evidence to prove that the husband is actually impotent. Under such circumstances, mental cruelty

husband had postponed the nuptial, she apprehends that he is impotent. The Court has come to the conclusion that the said allegation is without ... husband merely because marriage of some of the relative of the husband was dissolved because of impotency. The Court has considered the medical certificate

public bone 3) Disfigured private part area and left thigh 4) Impotency 5) Restricted movements at right hip and left knee. 6) Not able ... determining probable loss of earning capacity. A person's impotency would have no relation to his ability to earn income. This argument is, therefore

relate to the period after his marriage with Kavita. Moreover, those 12 documents do not prove that Nagaraja Rao was impotent, and birth of Master ... time. 15. Another main contention of Manikyamma is that her husband was impotent and she disputes the 20 paternity of Master Yeshas. She has produced

marriage wa s not consummated because of either his impotency or the impotency of the wife. What has been stated is that the marriage could ... reluctance on the part of the petitioner-wife to have sexual relation with the respondent-husband . The statement of objections filed by the petitioner -wife

basis of the averments made in the petition relating to cruelty but on the basis of non-consummation of marriage without any entitlement ... petitioner necessarily cannot lead to a presumption that the respondent is impotent, it could equally be that the petitioner herself is not tuned

properties of Siddoji Rao. Ex. F. 1 can only be relatable to this interest and the life estate created in her favour under ... only disqualified heirs are persons who are of unsound mind, impotent persons, outcaste, born blind, deaf and idiots. Hence, Ramachandra Rao cannot be said