Therefore it is clear that only intention of the petitioner is to relitigate.
16. The conduct of the respondent clearly demonstrates that he does ... Modi Vs. K.N.Modi ) when dealing with a case of relitigation has observed as follows:
One of the examples cited as an abuse
favour of the respondent is genuine or not. Earlier cases are relitigation and this case is not relitigation and in the present suit, the parties ... respondent is clearly abuse of process of law and amounts to relitigation for title of the suit property. The judgments relied on by the learned
examples cited as an abuse of the process of the Court is
relitigation. It is an abuse of the process of the Court and contrary ... justice and public policy for a party to relitigate the same issue which has
already been tried and decided earlier against him. The reagitation
examples cited as an abuse of the process of the court is relitigation. It is an abuse of the process of the court and contrary ... justice and public policy for a party to relitigate the same issue which has already been tried and decided earlier against him. The reagitation
Honourable Apex Court, in
the said Judgment, held that Relitigation is an abuse of process of Court and
Paragraph 44 of the said Judgment ... examples cited as an abuse of process of the Court is
relitigation. It is an abuse of process of the Court and contrary to justice
well settled principles founded on public policy. Such repeated
litigations or relitigations are abuses of the process of the Court and
contrary to justice ... doctrine of res judicata or be struck out on ground
that such relitigation results in abuse of the process of the Court. Even
where
Sri S Hareesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 April, 2018
Author: B.V
wherein, this Court held that the suit, which amounts to relitigation or abuse of process of Court has to be rejected at threshold
Consequently, we are of the view that the present appeals amount to
relitigation. The Supreme Court in KK Modi Vs. KN. Modi ... court and contrary to
justice and public policy for a party to relitigate the same issue which has
already been tried and decided earlier against
fact between parties. It depends upon well-known doctrines which control the relitigation of issues which are settled by prior litigation."
This decision
