prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order of removal from service passed by the second respondent in his proceedings dated 11.9.2006, confirmed ... removal passed by the second respondent, confirmed by the first respondent is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that removal from service after
Appellate
Authority, by order dated 20.05.2010, set aside the order of removal from
service, dated 31.07.1990, holding that such an order had been passed
without ... till 31.07.1990
i.e. the date on which he was 'Removed from service, be
treated as extra ordinary leave. However. he shall
Secretariat
Service/Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service, the respective petitioners joined the said
post. Upon completion of the mandatory period of probation, the service ... service. Once a person is appointed into a service and
moreso the said individual is regularised in service, the individual can be
terminated/removed/dismissed
hand has been filed, questioning the validity of the order
of removal from service issued in proceedings dated 01.10.2013 by the 2nd
respondent / the Chief ... removal
to the address stated in the application under Right to Information Act and
the said letter containing the order of removal from service
view of removing the appellant from service, instead of dismissing him from service, considering the productive years of service put in by him, and therefore ... appellant from service instead of dismissing him from service, probably for the reason that the dismissal casts a stigma on the service career
continue in service. In other words, persons who entered the service later were retained and those who entered the service earlier were retrenched. The petitioners ... allowed to continue in service. In other words, persons who entered the service later were retained and those who entered service earlier were retrenched
Educational Officer, Coimbatore, the teacher R. Sreenivasan is ordered to be removed from service.
3. On receipt of this order the petitioner handed over charge ... Deputy Inspector, on the basis of which the petitioner had been removed from service. The respondent admitted receipt only of the letters dated 13th September
Governing body of the second respondent College proposing punishment of removal
from service. The first respondent filed W.P.No.37797 of 2003 and this ... passed earlier by the second
respondent and restored the order of removal from service, which was confirmed
by the Supreme Court by dismissing the Special
impugned order dated 19.05.1998, by awarding him the punishment of removal from service with effect from 19.05.1998.
9.Being dissatisfied with the order of punishment ... limit and fulfil other conditions as laid down. The individual was removed from service on disciplinary grounds and also is not within the prescribed maximum
Chief Engineer passed orders that the petitioner he removed from service with effect from that date. In that order it was also indicated that ... lenient view of the matter and modified the punishment of removal from service to one of compulsory retirement.
16. The respondents state that the order
