Smt. Geetha Pandit Rao vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 November, 2020
Smt. Geetha Pandit Rao vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 November, 2020
IN THE
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 146 (0.75 seconds)M/S. Provident Housing Limited vs Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory ... on 2 January, 2023
STATE OF U.P.1 wherein the Apex Court considers the
retroactivity and retrospectivity of the Act in the following
paragraphs:
"40. Learned counsel ... from a time
antecedent to its passing, at the same time, retroactive statute
1
2021 SCC OnLine SC 1044
30
means a statute which creates
Puttalinganagouda @ Veeranagouda B ... vs The Union Of India on 19 February, 2015
difference between a Prospective, a Retrospective and a
Retroactive Statute is briefly explained thus :
"38. (i) A prospective statute operates forwards
from the date ... There is the intermediate category called
"Retroactive Statute" which does not operate backwards
and does not take away vested rights. Though it operates
M/S Cambrian Technologies Private ... vs Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory ... on 15 February, 2023
STATE OF U.P.1 wherein the Apex Court considers
the retroactivity and retrospectivity of the Act in the
following paragraphs:
"40. Learned counsel ... from a time
antecedent to its passing, at the same time,
retroactive statute means a statute which creates a
new obligation on transactions or considerations
Smt Susheelamma Since Dead By Lrs vs K Seetharamaiah on 2 November, 2023
stated that the prospective statute operates from
the date of its enactment conferring/granting new rights
while the retrospective statute operates backwards taking ... away vested rights. It stated that Section 6 would be a
retroactive statute, the one that operates in futuro, its
operation is based upon
Late Sri. K. Byrappa vs Smt. Puttamadamma on 18 December, 2025
takes
away or impairs vested rights acquired under
existing laws. A retroactive statute is the one that
does not operate retrospectively. It operates in
futuro ... takes away or impairs vested
rights acquired under existing laws. A
retroactive statute is the one that does not
operate retrospectively. It operates in futuro
Late Sri. K. Byrappa vs Smt. Ankamma (Dead) Smt. Bhagya on 18 December, 2025
takes
away or impairs vested rights acquired under
existing laws. A retroactive statute is the one that
does not operate retrospectively. It operates in
futuro ... takes away or impairs vested
rights acquired under existing laws. A
retroactive statute is the one that does not
operate retrospectively. It operates in futuro
Neelambika vs Akkamahadevi on 9 October, 2023
case of Vineeta Sharma. To
understand the meaning of retroactive effect of a statute, we
have extracted paragraph No.56 of the said judgment ... takes
away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing
laws. A retroactive statute is the one that does not
operate retrospectively. It operates in futuro
Smt. Akkamahadevi W/O Basappa Betageri vs Neelambika W/O Veerappa Churi on 9 October, 2023
case of Vineeta Sharma. To
understand the meaning of retroactive effect of a statute, we
have extracted paragraph No.56 of the said judgment ... takes
away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing
laws. A retroactive statute is the one that does not
operate retrospectively. It operates in futuro
Shamanur Kallappa And Sons And Ors. vs State Of Karnataka, By Its Secretary To ... on 26 May, 2003
also settled that unless there are words in the statute sufficient to show the intention of the legislature to affect existing rights it is deemed ... thinking of the Courts seems to be 'curative statutes' normally retroactive and a fresh statutes are prospective. Thus where a statute simply codifies