leading to the filing of the instant writ petition, defended the retrospective regularisation of appointment and promotion. While the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted ... that the retrospective regularisation of the officiating promotion of the respondent No. 3 was illegal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 submitted that there
posts commensurating to their educational qualification. As
regards the plea of retrospective regularisation, he submits that in
absence of any direction in the award ... workmen cannot claim
retrospective regularisation of their services.
12. I first deal with the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner involved
in the first writ petition
also filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the retrospective regularisation of the appellants, which was registered as WP(C) No. 5342 ... therefore, the Government has committed an error in granting retrospective regularisation to the appellants. It is further contended that there is no reasonable justification
also filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the retrospective
regularisation of the appellants, which was registered as WP (C) No. 5342 ... purpose of seniority. The
decision of the Government giving retrospective effect to appellants' regularisation
cannot be said to be a correct decision. However
vide Annexure-A/5 the Government issued an order giving retrospective regularisation to the private respondents No. 4 to 13 from the date of their ... thereby that the persons who were holding adhoc appointment and got retrospective regularisation shall be entitled to seniority from the date of their
same benefits and therefore, the respondents in this case were given retrospective regularisation in the posts of Executive Engineer. This order has been challenged ... services of temporary or ad-hoc appointees with retrospective effect, but if such regularisation requires consultation with the Public Service Commission then the regularisation
were not regularised. The petitioner, thereafter,
approached the respondent authorities for retrospective regularisation of the services of
her husband so as to enable ... would be entitled to family pension and pensionary services on the
retrospective regularisation of the services of her husband by reckoning the services
rendered
back date and the Court should refrain itself from directing the
retrospective regularization. However, in the case in hand, the posts were created and
sanctioned ... order of regularization dated 31.03.2016 giving retrospective regularization nor the
petitioners are seeking any direction for their retrospective regularisation. Therefore, in
the given facts
back date and the Court should refrain itself from directing the
retrospective regularization. However, in the case in hand, the posts were created and
sanctioned ... order of regularization dated 31.03.2016 giving retrospective regularization nor the
petitioners are seeking any direction for their retrospective regularisation. Therefore, in
the given facts
ASTEC prior to 07.12.2002. Therefore, the claim of the petitioner for retrospective
regularisation is not tenable in law.
13. Having regard to the above
