Thus, the petitioners have approached this Court for the
relief of retrospective regularisation and for grant of Old Pension
Scheme as their initial appointment ... that, regularization cannot be granted in
violation of the Rules and retrospective regularisation is also
21/24
http://www.judis
Thus, the petitioners have approached this Court for the
relief of retrospective regularisation and for grant of Old Pension
Scheme as their initial appointment ... that, regularization cannot be granted in
violation of the Rules and retrospective regularisation is also
impermissible. In view of the fact that, all the petitioners
impugned order also states that the
petitioner is not entitled for retrospective regularisation as there is no rule
to grant such retrospective regularisation by restoring ... from service in the
year 2002 and he seeks relief of retrospective regularisation from the date
of his initial appointment, now, after a lapse
permitted to draw the arrears of Pay and allowances with
retrospective effect under the usual Head of Account.”
http://www.judis ... eligible to draw arrears of
increments, if any, consequent on the retrospective regularisation of
his service as ordered in para (1) above
permitted to draw the arrears of Pay and allowances with
retrospective effect under the usual Head of Account.”
http://www.judis ... eligible to draw arrears of
increments, if any, consequent on the retrospective regularisation of
his service as ordered in para (1) above
regularisation of her service. The Tribunal through
the impugned award directed the Management to confirm the service
of the second respondent with retrospective effect ... construed, as if the second respondent is a regular
employee. Retrospective regularisation cannot be given. The second
respondent had only made self serving statement before
counter
affidavit that the petitioner is now attempting to get retrospective
regularisation from the year 2002 only to make him eligible to get the
pension
petitioners are not
entitled to get any regularisation, therefore, further retrospective
regularisation since the petitioners sought for, cannot be granted,
therefore, the said aspect having ... reference cited and to
state that your representation dated 16.12.2019 requesting
retrospective regularisation have been examined in detail
considering the grounds that the petitioners were
second
respondent to the limited extent of the date of effect of regularisation of
service of the petitioner in the post of Superintendent is concerned ... inclusion in the panel. This being
the factum established, the retrospective regularisation of services in the
post of Superintendent cannot be granted as the writ
this distance point of
time and the petitioner cannot claim for retrospective regularisation of
service on this flimsy ground.
7. The Government has already fixed
