would have a prospective effect. It
cannot be applied retrospectively. Any
vacancy which has arisen prior to coming into
force of the said amended Regulations ... enactment of law reviewing the defect pointed
out in a judgment and retrospectively
enacting the law so as to render the judgment
of the court
that the provisions of the Amended Act, 2016 were to be applied
retrospectively. Merely because the suit has been filed after the enactment ... placed under Section 4 of the
Benami Act would not apply retrospectively, is no longer res
integra. The said proposition had come up before
Court of
Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of
the First Class was, retrospectively amended in as
much as the forum of trial after 2002 Amendment ... retrospectively changed to the Court of
Session. The statute that affects the rights of
the accused was also considered. After taking note
of the decision
Court of
Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of
the First Class was, retrospectively amended in as
much as the forum of trial after 2002 Amendment ... retrospectively changed to the Court of
Session. The statute that affects the rights of
the accused was also considered. After taking note
of the decision
well-established proposition that such a change of
law operates retrospectively and the person has to
go to the new forum even if his cause ... clearly show that
the change of forum was meant to be operative
retrospectively irrespective of the fact as to when
the accident occurred. To that
Court of
Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of
the First Class was, retrospectively amended in as
much as the forum of trial after 2002 Amendment ... retrospectively changed to the Court of
Session. The statute that affects the rights of
the accused was also considered. After taking note
of the decision
Court of
Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of
the First Class was, retrospectively amended in as
much as the forum of trial after 2002 Amendment ... retrospectively changed to the Court of
Session. The statute that affects the rights of
the accused was also considered. After taking note
of the decision
Court of
Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of
the First Class was, retrospectively amended in as
much as the forum of trial after 2002 Amendment ... retrospectively changed to the Court of
Session. The statute that affects the rights of
the accused was also considered. After taking note
of the decision
legislative bodies are prevented
from making the laws even affecting substantive rights retrospectively. But
there are well defined limitations in exercising such power of enacting ... date anterior to the enactment. There are statutes removing
disabilities or disqualifications retrospectively by validation. The case of
N. IBOMCHA SINGH v. L. CHANDRAMANI SINGH
other words a change in the law of procedure
operates retrospectively and unlike the law relating
to vested right is not only prospective ... Thus, the change in the procedural law operates
retrospectively unlike the law relating to vested right, i.e., substantive
law. In another decision
