Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 61 (4.25 seconds)

C.I.T Mumbai vs M/S Sarkar Builders on 15 May, 2015

fine distinction between the retroactive nature of amendment in contrast with retrospectivity of a provision. He argued that once the project is financed after ... argued that clause (d) inserted with effect from 01.04.2005 should be applied retrospectively, which argument was repelled by the High Court. Therefore, for better understanding
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 74 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next