mandatory injunction directing
the 2nd defendant to register the Deed of Revocation of GPA dated
07/06/2016 without insisting the presence of 1st defendant ... matters if the
said GPA is misused by the GPA holder. Therefore, it is just and
necessary to cancel the GPA in order to avoid
GPA of
the year 2002 (Deed dated 13th October, 2003 of Revocation of GPA) as null
and void; (iii) declaration of the plaintiffs Sarabjit Prakash ... dated 17th July, 2004 and Deed dated 13th October, 2003 of
Revocation of GPA is expressly pleaded; (ii) order dated 2nd June
Communication of revocation. No effective
challenge is made regarding authenticity.
20. Ex.D2 is publication notifying public about revocation
of GPA. This assumes legal ... been effectively
discredited. This lends probability to defence that: GPA revocation
was consequence of builder's default.
23. DW-1 has deposed that after
Gopal and J.M. Adi Narayana
at the time of revocation of GPA on 31.5.2000.
13 O.S.No. 285/2008 ... GPA, they have not taken
any legal action to revoke or cancel the said GPA and they have
not issued paper publication regarding revocation
issued notice dated 11.07.2012 to Sri.K.Satyanarayana
informing him about revocation of GPA earlier executed in
his favour. Therefore, the Rectification Deeds executed ... very well be gathered. The
defence set out is that before revocation of GPA long back
during 2004 itself on the strength of GPA defendant
possession letter and receipt for Rs. 30,10,000/-,
a registered revocable GPA, a registered Will (in favour of plaintiffs)
and an Affidavit/NOC mentioning ... pages 38-46) with Defendant No.3, who
also executed a revocable GPA in favour of Defendant No.1 (Mark
C, pages
GPA stood
revoked. The sale deed, having been executed after the
revocation of GPA, is a void document.
(vi) Defendant No.3 has acted illegally ... Deeds;
(viii) The plaintiff never filed a suit challenging or seeking
revocation of GPA and thus, revocation cannot be deemed to
have been done
well as Respondent No. 2. The arbitrator held
that unilateral revocation of GPA by Respondent no. 2 was illegal and that the
company ... terms of
JDA were not followed.
33. It was only after revocation of GPA that the company filed an application
for arbitration seeking interim orders
S V Narayana Swamy vs Smt Savithramma on 2 September, 2013
-1-
IN THE HIGH
defendants 1 to 16 and 17th defendant
has taken place after revocation of GPA i.e., on
22.02.2004 and after filing of the suit ... favour of
17th defendant on 22.05.2003 and as such revocation of
GPA by plaintiffs is of no consequence. He would also
submit that Trial Court
