S V Narayana Swamy vs Smt Savithramma on 2 September, 2013
S V Narayana Swamy vs Smt Savithramma on 2 September, 2013
-1-
IN THE HIGH
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 126 (0.81 seconds)Sri. M Krishnappa vs Sri. K T Srinivas on 12 August, 2014
defendants 1 to 16 and 17th defendant
has taken place after revocation of GPA i.e., on
22.02.2004 and after filing of the suit ... favour of
17th defendant on 22.05.2003 and as such revocation of
GPA by plaintiffs is of no consequence. He would also
submit that Trial Court
Sri Aditya Kankaria vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 April, 2024
terms of JDA
were not followed.
33. It was only after revocation of GPA that
the company filed an application for arbitration
seeking interim orders ... must
also be borne in mind that subsequent to the revocation
26
of GPA, it was the Appellants herein who had first
resorted to arbitration
Sri Aditya Kanakaria vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 April, 2024
terms of JDA
were not followed.
33. It was only after revocation of GPA that
the company filed an application for arbitration
seeking interim orders ... must
also be borne in mind that subsequent to the revocation
26
of GPA, it was the Appellants herein who had first
resorted to arbitration
Sri Aditya Kankaria vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 April, 2024
terms of JDA
were not followed.
33. It was only after revocation of GPA that
the company filed an application for arbitration
seeking interim orders ... must
also be borne in mind that subsequent to the revocation
26
of GPA, it was the Appellants herein who had first
resorted to arbitration
Mr. H Sunil Kumar vs State Of Karnataka on 20 December, 2021
terms of JDA
were not followed.
33. It was only after revocation of GPA that the
company filed an application for arbitration seeking
interim orders ... must
also be borne in mind that subsequent to the revocation of
GPA, it was the Appellants herein who had first resorted
to arbitration proceedings
Patel Engineering Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 August, 2024
terms of JDA were not followed.
It was only after revocation of GPA that the company filed an
application for arbitration seeking interim orders ... must also be borne in mind
that subsequent to the revocation of GPA, it was the appellants
herein who had first resorted to arbitration proceedings
Rajkumar Chellappan Pillai vs State Of Karnataka on 4 April, 2025
terms of JDA were not followed. It was only after
27
revocation of GPA that the company filed an
application for arbitration seeking interim orders ... must also be borne in mind that subsequent to
the revocation of GPA, it was the appellants herein
who had first resorted to arbitration proceedings
Sri Naveen Reddy vs Mr Jagannath Vainatheya Prasanna on 21 June, 2023
terms of JDA
were not followed.
33. It was only after revocation of
GPA that the company filed an application
for arbitration seeking interim orders ... must
also be borne in mind that subsequent to the
revocation of GPA, it was the Appellants herein
who had first resorted to arbitration
proceedings
Narendra R Badigar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 August, 2022
terms of JDA were not followed.
33. It was only after revocation of
GPA that the company filed an application
for arbitration seeking interim orders ... must
also be borne in mind that subsequent to the
revocation of GPA, it was the Appellants herein
who had first resorted to arbitration proceedings