Devika Biswas vs Union Of India . on 14 September, 2016
Author: Madan B. Lokur
Bench
means of livelihood. If the right to livelihood is
not treated as a part of the constitutional right to life,
the easiest way of depriving ... established by
law, if the right to livelihood is not regarded as a part
of the right to life. That, which alone makes it
possible
Suresh Chand Gautam vs State Of Uttar Pradesh . on 11 March, 2016
Author: Dipak Misra
future point of time, the right to employment can also be brought in under the concept of right to life or even included ... post or employment. Their right to employment, if it is a part of right to life, would stand denuded by the preferring of those
future point of time, the right to employment can also be brought in under the concept of right to life or even included ... post or employment. Their right to employment, if it is a part of right to life, would stand denuded by the preferring of those
providing of the required medical aid amounts
to denying the right to life to all the patients who approach
the concerned Government hospital. Denying minimum ... wages to the workmen also amounts to denying the right to
life of the workers. The Government should be the model
employer and cannot
amount to an affront on the
constitutional imperatives of equality and right to life, protected
under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India ... that at least when it comes to violations of the
fundamental right to life and personal liberty, delay or laches by
itself would
Parliament to preserve the rights of Indian citizens, then clearly gender rights are also a fundamental part of such rights. It is unfortunate that some ... most of them were rights based. So, you have right to life and personal liberty, right to live in the community, right to integrity, protection
their fundamental rights guaranteed under
Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 21 provides that no person shall be
deprived of his life or personal liberty ... content of this article has been expanded
by judicial decisions. Right to life enshrined in this article means
something more than survival or animal existence
without assigning any reasons whatsoever. Even under the
said Clause, the LIC reserves right to terminate without assigning the
reasons. On 15.12.2015, LIC have taken ... view of the policy decision taken by the LIC, the
petitioner-Association have no right whatsoever to seek writ of
prohibition restraining the respondents