Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.33 seconds)

C Chnadrakala vs D/O Post on 12 October, 2018

According to the counsel for the respondents, the RMP procedure was introduced 7 OA 1779/2014 only for making the procedure for ascertaining indigency transparent ... ground that the applicant failed to get adequate Relative Merit Points(RMP), awarded on the basis of various parameters to assess the financial condition
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

V Rathinam vs D/O Post on 12 September, 2018

2016 & Btch 2. Less indigent as per Relative Merit Points(RMP) under RRR quota." 5. According to the counsel for the applicants ... RMP system was implemented from 2010 onwards and it was not the scheme that was prevalent at the time of application for compassionate appointment
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Senthil Kumar vs D/O Post on 12 September, 2018

prevailing at the time of death of father. According to him, the RMP procedure came into existence only on 20.1.2010 and this should not have ... alongwith 95 other applicants and the applicant could get only 53 RMP. The points required was 61 and the applicant was considered as less indigent
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A Anandhakumar vs D/O Post on 3 October, 2018

that the applicant did not secure the minimum required Relative Merit Points (RMP) to warrant an appointment. Based on a request to the first ... third respondents to furnish the RMP awarded to him through RTI, the same 3 OA 1767/2017 was furnished which is annexed as A2 order
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A Mohanraj vs D/O Post on 3 October, 2018

found to be indigent in terms of the Relative Merit Points (RMP) and due to non availability of 5% direct recruitment vacancies to accommodate ... scheme that was prevailing in the year 2007 and not under the RMP system which was a subsequent development. Had the applicant been considered
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Prabhu vs D/O Post on 3 October, 2018

found to be indigent in terms of the Relative Merit Points (RMP) and due to non availability of 5% direct recruitment vacancies to accommodate ... details of the assessment made under different criteria while arriving at the RMP below the cut off in respect of the applicant. 4. Learned counsel
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Suseela vs D/O Post on 26 November, 2018

down on the ground that the applicant was awarded Relative Merit Points (RMP) of 78 against 91 of the last selected candidate ... perusal, it is seen that the applicant had been awarded 78 RMP against his claim of 83. Even assuming that the claim is valid
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next