Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 6940 (1.66 seconds)

M C Kumar vs M/O Railways on 9 October, 2018

permanent Railway servant. (6) The payment of allowances under Sub-rule (2) or Sub- rule (4) shall be subject to all other conditions under which ... rule (2) or under the Sub-rule (4) shall not be less than the subsistence allowance and other allowances admissible under Rule 1342
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs Gm N.Rly. on 11 August, 2025

covered by Rule 1343 and 1344 R- II and need not be regularized Such a period will be governed by Rule 1342 ... period of the applicant shall be treated as „Suspension‟ as per Rule 1342-R-11 and will not count as qualifying service for pension
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahender Kumar vs M/O Railways on 30 August, 2019

permanent railway servant. (6) The payment of allowances under Sub-rule(2) or sub- rule (4) shall be subject to all other conditions under which ... rule (2) or under sub-rule (4) shall not be less than the subsistence allowance and other allowances admissible under Rule 1342
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next