CAT rejected Dy.No.2685 of 2003, on the ground that it was filed only for execution of the CAT's order dated ... fact, no limitation period has been prescribed for compliance of the CAT's order.
8. For the reasons aforesaid, we set aside the impugned
Court by order dated 25.3.2013 in Writ Petition No.72872 of 2012 (S-CAT) (Union of India, rep. by the Secretary, Department of Posts
Court by order dated 25.3.2013 in Writ Petition No.72872 of 2012 (S-CAT) (Union of India, rep. by the Secretary, Department of Posts
petitioner would charge that this Court has only become a cat's paw of the crocodile tears shedding by helmet lobbyists' group consisting
Court by order dated 25.3.2013 in
Writ Petition No.72872 of 2012 (S-CAT)
(Union of India, rep. By the Secretary,
Department of Posts
civil Court, it just
scrapes through by the proverbial cat's whisker owing to the facts and
circumstances of case on hand and because
impugned
awards just pass the patent illegality test by the proverbial cat's whisker.
19 This takes us to the next submission turning
impugned
awards just pass the patent illegality test by the proverbial cat's whisker.
19 This takes us to the next submission turning
s
circular dated 29.6.1999 and 31.01.2002. The High Court agreed
with the findings and observations of the CAT and dismissed the
department's Writ ... CAT in
limine. Thereafter, the Supreme Court had also dismissed the
department's Civil Appeal in the matter. CAT's decision is based
s
circular dated 29.6.1999 and 31.01.2002. The High Court agreed
with the findings and observations of the CAT and dismissed the
department's Writ ... CAT in
limine. Thereafter, the Supreme Court had also dismissed the
department's Civil Appeal in the matter. CAT's decision is based
