Court has
referred to the decision in SAIL case³ and
opined that it is undisputed that Hindustan
Aeronautics Ltd. is an undertaking of the
Central ... Heavy Engg. Mazdoor Union
has been approved in SAIL³ with some
divergence. The authority in SAIL case³,
as the conclusion would show, covers
two situations
value, as the reference post (see Orissa University of
Agriculture & Technology case [ Orissa University of
Agriculture & Technology v. Manoj K. Mohanty ... SAIL case [SAIL v. Dibyendu Bhattacharya,
(2011) 11 SCC 122 : (2011) 2 SCC (L&S) 192] and
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. case [ National Aluminium
value, as the reference post (see Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology case [ Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology v. Manoj K. Mohanty ... SAIL case [SAIL v. Dibyendu Bhattacharya, (2011) 11 SCC 122 : ( 2011) 2 SCC (L&S) 192] and National Aluminium Co. Ltd. case [ National Aluminium
course of his employment. He has
further submitted that in case the SAIL Gratuity Rules contain anything
inconsistent with the same as above, in terms ... SAIL. According to the respondent, not the amended Rules
but the SAIL Gratuity Rules, 1966 and Rule 3.2.1 (c) thereof is
applicable in case
course of his employment. He has
further submitted that in case the SAIL Gratuity Rules contain anything
inconsistent with the same as above, in terms ... SAIL. According to the respondent, not the amended Rules
but the SAIL Gratuity Rules, 1966 and Rule 3.2.1 (c) thereof is
applicable in case
that the family has received
terminal benefits. The Apex Court in the case of Canara
Bank v. M. Mahesh Kumar reported ... undoubtedly
bring some solace to the situation."
21. Referring to SAIL case [(2000) 6 SCC 493 : 2000 SCC
(L&S) 767] , the High
A.Elangovan, vs State Of Tamil Nadu, on 6 April, 2026
Author: M.Dhandapani
Bench
circumstances slated in the affidavit fied in support herent,
the said case should not be arimilted,
The Court further made the following ORDER ... which date the case stands pasted for hearing,
fading wherein {he sail case wil be heard and determined ex-parte
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
IPRESENT:
HONOURAGSLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPAT!
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 401 OF 2025
Setwean:
Jangarm Reddeppa, Sfa. (Late) Seetha Ramayya, aged about ... T8512 of 2024 dated 24.06. 2004.
WHEREAS the sail case coming on for orders as fo admission on
this day and whereas the High Court
Contempt of courts Act 1974, the above case through his Counsel
ORD VAY MATHURUMILIG praying that this Hon'ble High Court may be
espoancent herein ... Advonate for the Pelitioner, directed issuance af No
Support thergof ihe sail case should not be admitted.
ran
Bet
it ey
ue eas
, Pee whee
