Indian
Evidence . Act, 1872" found in S. 162 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure. Section 145 of the Evidence Act, it is said,
empowers ... intended to be used for
contradiction under S. 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Section 145 of the Evidence Act is in two parts
MPHC-IND:35023
15
substantive evidence. According to Section 162 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, no statement made by any person to a police ... Lord Atkin , in that case , while dealing with Section
162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure observed:
'Then follows the section in question which
cannot be used as substantive evidence. According to Section 162 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, no statement made by any person to a police ... Lord Atkin , in that case , while dealing with Section 162
of the Code of Criminal Procedure observed:
'Then follows the section in question which
cannot
be used as substantive evidence. According to Section 162 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, no statement made by any person to a police ... Lord Atkin ,
in that case , while dealing with Section 162 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure observed:
'Then follows the section in question which
cannot be used as
substantive evidence. According to Section 162 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, no statement made by any person to a police ... Lord Atkin , in that case , while
dealing with Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure observed:
'Then follows the section in question which
cannot be used as
substantive evidence. According to Section 162 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, no statement made by any person to a police ... Lord Atkin , in that case , while dealing with Section
162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure observed:
'Then follows the section in question which
cannot be used as substantive evidence. According to Section 162 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, no statement made by any person to a police ... Lord Atkin , in that case , while dealing with Section 162 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure observed:
‗Then follows the section in question which
cannot be used as substantive evidence. According to Section 162 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, no statement made by any person to a police ... Lord Atkin , in that case , while dealing with Section 162 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure observed:
‗Then follows the section in question which
State Of M.P. vs Dinesh Singh Yadav on 31 October, 2022
Author: Gurpal Singh
holding that the complaint, Ex. 49, was not hit by Section 162 Criminal Procedure Code and was admissible in evidence. In our opinion, since ... Section 162 Criminal Procedure Code, it was inadmissible in evidence and could not have been exhibited by the learned trial Court. We have, therefore, ruled
