decoy police constable was, therefore, inadmissible in
evidence under Section 162 Cr.P.C. it was Held further, that "it cannot
be too strongly ... came within the
term 'investigation' under Section 2(h) of the Code of Criminal Procedure because
investigation had commenced on recording
decoy police constable was, therefore, inadmissible in
evidence under Section 162 Cr.P.C. it was Held further, that "it cannot
be too strongly ... came within the
term 'investigation' under Section 2(h) of the Code of Criminal Procedure because
investigation had commenced on recording
decoy police constable was, therefore,
inadmissible in evidence under Section 162 Cr.P.C. it was Held further, that
"it cannot be too strongly ... came within the term 'investigation' under Section 2(h) of
the Code of Criminal Procedure because investigation had commenced on
recording
2023 St. Vs. Mamta
11
therefore, inadmissible in evidence under Section 162 Cr.P.C. it was Held
further, that "it cannot ... came within the term
'investigation' under Section 2(h) of the Code of Criminal Procedure because
investigation had commenced on recording
State vs Gautam Jain on 17 January, 2025
IN THE COURT OF SH. JOGINDER PRAKASH
search is conducted without warrant of court under Section
165 of the Code, the I.O. must record reasons and a search memo
should ... recorded by the Investigating
Officer in a manner violative of Section 162 Cr.P.C. as the
procedure requires the Investigating Officer to record
under
Section 21 of the Evidence Act. This, however, is
subject to the bar of admissibility of a statement
under Section 161 CrPC ... admission, the statement being
one under Section 161 , it would immediately attract
the bar under Section 162 CrPC."
(Emphasis supplied)
17. Reference
State vs Ashutosh on 25 March, 2025
CNR No. DLNE01-003280-2021
State v. Ashutosh
State vs Shyam Sunder Etc (5) on 29 November, 2025
IN THE COURT OF SH
162 Cr.P.C. (section 181 of BNSS) is that the
accused can use the statement under section 161 of Cr.P.C. (section ... evidence. As stated in the proviso
to sub-Section (1) of section 162, the witness has to be contradicted in the
manner provided under Section