Sanjeev Alias Sonu & Birender @ Boya vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 May, 2013
Sanjeev Alias Sonu & Birender @ Boya vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 May
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1488 (2.35 seconds)Smti Manju Lakra vs The State Of Assam on 5 August, 2013
breach would ensue penal action
from the end of the State. While imposing the injunction, as the Indian
Penal Code envisages, law presumes ... bring the case within the First Exception to Section 300 of the Indian
Penal Code.
84. The relevant observations, appearing in Boya Munigadu (supra),
read
Radhey Shyam vs State Nct Of Delhi on 22 March, 2013
Section 302
IPC but it is a case falling under Section 304 Part II IPC . It is
trite law that Section ... appellant and his
statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
For bringing in operation Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
Mani Raj Rai vs State Of Sikkim on 9 September, 2013
were reduced
to one under Part II of Section 304 IPC from Section 302
IPC.
6(i). Mr. Karma Thinlay, Learned ... Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, of proving
that the case of the Accused falls within the Exceptions to
Section 300 IPC
Tayyab vs State Nct Of Delhi on 21 November, 2013
occurring
in Exception 4 to Section 300 Indian Penal Code is not
defined in Indian Penal Code . It takes two to make a
fight. Heat ... attacked each
other. All the ingredients to attract Exception 4 to
Section 300 , I.P.C. are established. There is no
Crl. A. No.1061
N.Chellaiah vs State By The Inspector Of Police on 1 February, 2013
limbs
of Section 299 of the Indian Penal Code. The first limb of Section 299 of the
Indian Penal Code speaks of the intention ... fall either
under Section 304 of I.P.C. or under Section 326 I.P.C. and not under Section
302 of
Naresh Kumar vs State on 9 December, 2013
occurring in Exception 4 to Section 300 Indian
Penal Code is not defined in Indian Penal Code . It
takes two to make a fight. Heat ... under Section
302 , I.P.C. but as Exception 4 is attracted, it would be
reduced to Section 304, Part I,
Suraj And Others vs State on 16 May, 2013
Supreme Court examined the difference between clause III of Section
300 and Section 304 IPC. The Supreme Court expounded upon the
requisites ... third part of Section 299 and will be
punishable under the second part of Section 304 of
the Indian Penal Code as culpable homicide
Darshan Singh And Anr. vs State on 16 December, 2013
judgments has awarded
the punishment under Section 302 IPC and not under Section 304 of IPC.
Learned APP for State also ... occurring in Exception 4 to Section 300 Indian
Penal Code is not defined in Indian Penal Code . It
takes two to make a fight. Heat
Anil Kumar vs State on 28 November, 2013
held that the distinction between culpable homicide ( Section 299 IPC) and
murder ( Section 300 IPC) has always to be carefully borne ... charge under Section 302 IPC the prosecution has to establish
the ingredients of the clause "3rdly' under Section 300 IPC