Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Judiciary becoming part of the state. Eminent Jurists like H.M.Seervai, V.N.Shukla consider judiciary to be State. Their view is supported
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 5747 (1.87 seconds)Constitution of India
Judiciary becoming part of the state. Eminent Jurists like H.M.Seervai, V.N.Shukla consider judiciary to be State. Their view is supported
The State Of Punjab vs Sodhi Sukhdev Singh on 15 November, 1960
Gupta, for the appellant.
Gopal Singh, for the respondent.
H. M. Seervai, Advocate-General for the State of
Maharashtra and R. H. Dhebar ... directed that the arguments urged by Mr. Viswanatha Sastri
and Mr. Seervai, for th appellant and the State of Bombay
respectively, should be treated
Adi Pherozshah Gandhi vs H. M. Seervai, Advocate-General Of ... on 21 August, 1970
Pherozshah Gandhi vs H. M. Seervai, Advocate-General Of ... on 21 August, 1970
Equivalent citations: 1971 AIR 385, 1971 SCR (2) 863, AIR 1971 SUPREME ... Vaidyialingam , A.N. Ray
PETITIONER:
ADI PHEROZSHAH GANDHI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
H. M. SEERVAI, ADVOCATE-GENERAL OF MAHARASHTRA, BOMBAY
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
21/08/1970
BENCH
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth And Anr. on 19 September, 1977
Chandrachud
JUDGMENT
1. We have heard the learned Attorney-General and Mr. Seervai fully on the various points arising in this appeal. We will deal ... Court.
On this statement being made by the learned Attorney-General, Mr. Seervai Counsel for respondent No. 1 (Justice S.H. Sheth) withdraws the writ
K.M. Nanavati vs The State Of Bombay on 5 September, 1960
Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L.
Vohra, for the petitioner.
H.M. Seervai, Advocate-General for the State of BombayAtul
Setalved and R. H. Dhebar ... dispute the power of the Court to
make this rule ?]
H.M. Seervai:--No, My Lord. The Court imposes a penalty
in 'its judicial
Devkumar Gopaldas Aggarwal And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 27 September, 2018
Mahimtura and Co. for the
petitioners in WP/853/2017.
Mr Navroj Seervai Sr Advocate/ Special counsel
with Mr A.B.Vagyani Govt. Pleader with
Union Of India vs Sankal Chand Himatlal Sheth And Anr on 19 September, 1977
Court. On this Statement being made by the
learned Attorney-General Mr. Seervai, counsel
for Respondent No. 1 (Justice S. E. Sheth)
withdraws the Writ ... Sachthey
and Miss A. Subhashini for the Appellant.
H. M. Seervai, B. R. Agarwala and Janendra Lal, for
Respondent No. 1.
ORDER
We have heard
S.C. Prashar vs Vasantsen Dwarkadas on 5 October, 1955
answer to the present question.
18. But is was argued by Mr. Seervai, relying on a recent decision of Calcutta High Court, Income-tax Officer ... amending Act of 1948. Since great reliance was placed by Mr. Seervai on certain observations of the learned Chief Justice in that case I would
Minoo Framroze Balsara vs The Union Of India And Others on 1 February, 1991
applied equally to both types of public premises.
12. Mr. H. M. Seervai, who led the arguments on behalf of the petitioners and appellant ... laid down in rejecting this limited challenge under Article 14.
13. Mr. Seervai drew attention to the judgment of the Supreme Court