Regarding Slow Progress Of Work On Rail-Cum-Road Projects In Bihar Due To ... on 27 April, 2012
>
Title: Regarding slow progress of work
2013 18:33:56 :::
901.arbpl606.12.sxw
slow progress of work. In turn, the Respondent forwarded the said
show cause notice ... dispute arose between
the Petitioner and Respondent about the alleged slow progress of
work. The Petitioner sent a reply on 1st March
work i.e. 6th
March 2001 till the proposed major variations were initiated by NHAI
(19th November 2001), the progress of the work was slow ... July 2003, the responsibility for the slow progress was of both parties.
Therefore, apportioning 10 months of slow progress to each party on pro
rata
bill of the said Tarashankar Construction Company on account of
slow progress of work. According to Mr. Chatterjee, appellant being the Assistant
Engineer ... from the first running
bill of the Contractor due to slow progress of work. Therefore, it cannot be said
that the appellant herein was responsible
under work
order dated 20.4.2011. Period for completion of work was 18 months.
After awarding of the contract since the progress of the work ... parties. It is the case of the appellant that slow progress of work
was due to reasons beyond the control of the appellant
denied that the appellant had given letters about slow progress
in the work. He has stated that the Contractor has received letters
dated ... stated that its amount of deposit, which was withheld for slow
progress in the work, might be released and the time limit of work
Combined Discussion On The Budget (Railways) 2012-13; Demands For Grants In ... on 20 March
Elect. Divn. No. 5 to the electrical contractor regarding slow progress of work/delay in laying of electrical conduit pipes in staircases ... Elect. Div. No.5, to the electrical contractor regarding slow progress of work/delay in laying of electrical conduit pipes in staircases
several occasions to the NCIPL
regarding the slow progress and gave notices to get the work completed
at the risk and costs of NCIPL ... progress
could be made. The Clients terminated the contract with NBCC on 5th
October 1989 for three reasons. The first being slow progress of work
Cementation Pvt. Ltd., also causing equal predicament of
stoppage of work for very precious time of two months.
The petitioner company failed to achieve ... respondent by the NTPC wherein they
have stated the slow progress of work in excavation, slow
production and cut of wall are in a very
