ground that earlier
the case was examined without a report of voice
spectrography test. The result of forensic voice examination
4
report relating ... vide memo dated 14.5.2010
intimated the CVO that the voice spectrography report dated
7.1.2000 was not considered earlier. The voice spectrography
report confirmed the voices
Const. Ram Kumar
(No. 391/W) were taken and sent for voice spectrography
alongwith questioned video cassettes for spectrography report /
opinion. A report was received ... that they were having similar
linguistic and phonetic features. The analysis of spectrography
examination of the common clue words / sentences selected
from the specimen voices
CFSL, New Delhi along with the questioned
video cassette for obtaining the spectrography report vide letter
Ex.PW3/B. Subsequently, there was a report ... done
by resorting i.e. speaker identification by conducting
spectrography analysis and other auditory examinations to
determine the voice of the speaker and by examination
substance, delivering the custody of the
petitioner to IO for 'Voice Spectrography Test' at FSL,
Gandhinagar.
3. RULE. Learned ... Station C.R. No.8 of 2014, including cooperation for
'Voice Spectrography Test' of the petitioner at FSL,
Gandhinagar. Learned APP submits that
argued that PW
6 has further admitted that the spectrography test
could not be carried out due to presence of lot of
interfering noises ... examined the recordings which had been
sent to him; the voice spectrography comparison of
questioned and specimen voice could not be carried
cassette marked as Mark Q1 and S1 by auditory
and voice spectrography and found that the voice sample marked
submitted that his client is
ready and willing to undergo the voice spectrography test. If the
applicant on his own free will and volition agrees ... always open for him to undergo.
Probably, the report of the voice spectrography test may make
the picture further clear. However at this point
voice sample of the Appellant was neither taken nor sent for voice
spectrography nor did the expert opine that there was no tempering/
interpolation ... same
was not sent to the expert at the CFSL for voice spectrography analysis.
Learned Trial Court has erroneously on the identification of the Complainant
voice as per the system establish in Forensic
Science Laboratory i.e. Spectrography Test. It is
further submitted that as per the case
Delhi along with the questioned
video cassettes for getting the voice spectrography report. He
had sent the same by forwarding letter
