ascertain that both the
defendant nos.1 and 2 are in the SPINDA relationship because it is an
essential and required information prior to solemnize ... marriage of defendant no.1 and 2 is illegal, they being in
SPINDA relationship of each other being under degree of prohibited
relationship
brother
of Laxmi Devi (PW6).
The appellant and deceased had thus, spinda relationship and
were in the degree of prohibited relationship for the purpose ... Hindu marriage under Section 5(v) is that parties are not spindas of each
other. In other words, a marriage may be solemnized between
correct that he does not
know the meaning of Spinda relation. He also does not know if
the Spinda relation prevalent in Hindu religion ... mentioned in Ex. DW1/B and the meaning of
Spinda he does not know as written in Ex. DW1/B. He converted
That passage runs thus:-
He should marry a girl, who is non-spinda (with himself). She is called his sapinda who has (particles
person to whom the adoption is
made as well as to offer spindas to that person and his
ancestors, and (2) to preserve the continuance
been denied by the appellant-wife by stating that there is no spinda relationship between the couple and that they had lived as husband
than the age of Kuldeep Kumar and as they
were having a spinda relationship (door ke bhai
behan). They were pressurizing us for the said
forming a joint Hindu family. The appellant's wife became his spinda on her marriage with him. The daughter too, on her birth, became ... spinda and until she leaves the family by marriage, the tie of sapindaship will bind her to the family of her birth. As said
Tikka Shatrujit Singh & Ors. vs Brig. Sukhjit Singh & Anr. on 19 November, 2010
Tehri Garhwal Bhumi Sambandhi Adhikar Niyam: s.6(4)-
Benefit under--'Spinda' of the Original 'khaikar' living
with
