Medieval History, School of Historical Science and
therefore the only split multiplier should have been applied for
determining loss of income.
12.It is submitted ... negligence, the compensation ought to have been awarded only after
applying split multiplier. It was submitted on behalf of the appellant that
deduction in the extent of income
after her retirement, a split multiplier was adopted. For the
period of 4 years left in her service ... multiplier and departed from
MACA. No. 2091 of 2009 -21-
the multiplier used by the Tribunal, without disclosing any
reasons thereof. In Madhusudhan the multiplier
would receive pension, so, the Tribunal ought to
have adopted the split multiplier.
21. The learned counsel for the petitioners/claimants has submitted
that ... dependents of the deceased, we will
decide the question of split multiplier. Admittedly, the deceased
Murugapandi and Balakrishnan were permanent government employees
having permanent income
have
considered multiplier 10 for the
whole salary and for pension
53
multiplier of 3 should be applied by
splitting the multiplier.
f. The Tribunal ... split multiplier is taken into
consideration for the period of 12 years. Only
for one year multiplier has to be split. Having
regard to this
have
considered multiplier 10 for the
whole salary and for pension
53
multiplier of 3 should be applied by
splitting the multiplier.
f. The Tribunal ... split multiplier is taken into
consideration for the period of 12 years. Only
for one year multiplier has to be split. Having
regard to this
have
considered multiplier 10 for the
whole salary and for pension
53
multiplier of 3 should be applied by
splitting the multiplier.
f. The Tribunal ... split multiplier is taken into
consideration for the period of 12 years. Only
for one year multiplier has to be split. Having
regard to this
have
considered multiplier 10 for the
whole salary and for pension
53
multiplier of 3 should be applied by
splitting the multiplier.
f. The Tribunal ... split multiplier is taken into
consideration for the period of 12 years. Only
for one year multiplier has to be split. Having
regard to this
multiplier of 9 should be applied. The claims Tribunal has
accordingly applied the multiplier of 9. As regards contention of the
appellant that split multiplier ... present case also multiplier of 9 is the
correct multiplier and there are no particular reasons or special circumstances
for applying split multiplier
multiplier of 9 should be applied. The claims Tribunal has
accordingly applied the multiplier of 9. As regards contention of the
appellant that split multiplier ... present case also multiplier of 9 is the
correct multiplier and there are no particular reasons or special circumstances
for applying split multiplier
deceased
Rajan was aged 52 years, has failed to adopt split multiplier, that the
Tribunal, without any basis, has awarded ... Whether the Tribunal erred in calculating the compensation
without invoking split multiplier method, even after giving a
finding that the deceased Rajan was aged
