facts of the case, it is pertinent to note that the standard of
proof which is required from the accused to rebut the statutory presumption ... interalia held the following:
"The standard of proof evidently is preponderance of probabilities.
Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only
from
accused. At this stage, it is pertinent to note that the standard of proof which is required from
the accused to rebut the statutory presumption ... interalia held the
following:
"The standard of proof evidently is preponderance of probabilities.
Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only
from
guilt of the accused lies on the complainant/prosecution
Also, the standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt. However, in offences
under section ... Further, it is also a settled proposition of law that the standard of proof which
is required from the accused to rebut the statutory presumption
defendant-accused cannot be expected to discharge
an unduly high standard or proof."
20. In Kumar Exports vs. Sharma Carpets ... enforceable debt or
other liability.
(e) What is the manner and standard of proof for
dislodging presumption under Section
facts of the case, it is pertinent to note that the standard of proof which is required from the
accused to rebut the statutory presumption ... interalia held the
following:
"The standard of proof evidently is preponderance of probabilities.
Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only
from
complainant/ prosecution to prove the guilt of the
accused. Also, the standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt. However,
in offences under section ... Further, it is also a settled proposition of law that the standard of proof
which is required from the accused to rebut the statutory presumption
facts of the case, it is pertinent to note that the standard of proof which is required from the
accused to rebut the statutory presumption ... interalia held the
following:
"The standard of proof evidently is preponderance of probabilities.
Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only
from
onus is on the accused to raise the
probable defence. The standard of proof for rebutting the
presumption is that of preponderance of probabilities ... which means
that the presumption under Section 139 is rebuttable.
Standard of proof: The standard of proof required to rebut
the presumption under Section
facts of the case, it is pertinent to note that the standard of proof which is required from the
accused to rebut the statutory presumption ... interalia held the
following:
"The standard of proof evidently is preponderance of probabilities.
Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only
from
facts of the case, it is pertinent to note that the standard of proof which is required from the
accused to rebut the statutory presumption ... interalia held the
following:
"The standard of proof evidently is preponderance of probabilities.
Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only
from
