storm, tornado,
flood and inundation. These together are referred to as “STFI Perils”. In 2001-02
the value of the insurance cover was enhanced ... insurer for a cover which would also
extend to STFI perils. On 26 September 2005, the premium of Rs 992 covering
STFI perils was refunded
Sepak Takraw Federation of India (hereinafter referred to as "the STFI"),
the validity and correctness of the constitution of an Ad-hoc Committee ... Court vide its Judgment & Order dated 01-03-2016 held that
STFI had no power and jurisdiction to interfere with the affairs/ functioning
which Storm, Tempest,
Flood, Inundation, Hurricane, Cyclone, Typhoon & Tornado (for short ‘STFI’)
was covered. The period of policy was from ... 412292/11/2015/6, 7 & 8 dated 27.2.2015
covered for STFI damage carrying a premium of Rs.3,09,878/= as yearly
premium
which
Storm, Tempest, Flood, Inundation, Hurricane, Cyclone, Typhoon & Tornado
(for short ‘STFI’) was covered. The period of policy was from ... 412292/11/2015/6, 7 & 8 dated 27.2.2015
covered for STFI damage carrying a premium of Rs.3,09,878/= as yearly
premium
ground that the policy was a Standard Fire Policy, which excluded STFI
(Storm, Tempest, Flood and Inundation) perils.
3. While deciding the complaint, the Commission ... plea
that the policy had been renewed uninterruptedly since inception, that STFI
perils had been excluded in all earlier years, and that the insured
accompanied by rain,
Storm, Cyclone, Typhoon, Tempest, Hurricane, Tornado, Flood and
Inundation (STFI Cover). As a result, the insured property namely ... loss suffered due to
damage caused to the insured property by STFI perils, the Surveyor had
visited the factory on 29.05.2012 and conducted preliminary survey
accompanied by rain,
Storm, Cyclone, Typhoon, Tempest, Hurricane, Tornado, Flood and
Inundation (STFI Cover). As a result, the insured property namely ... loss suffered due to
damage caused to the insured property by STFI perils, the Surveyor had
visited the factory on 29.05.2012 and conducted preliminary survey
further argued that the learned District Forum has
erred in holding that STFI coverage is not included in the said
policy. It is further argued ... observing that the
complainant has not paid the premium for the STFI coverage. The
learned District Forum ought to have considered the fact that
further argued that the learned District Forum has
erred in holding that STFI coverage is not included in the said
policy. It is further argued ... observing that the
complainant has not paid the premium for the STFI coverage. The
learned District Forum ought to have considered the fact that
further argued that the learned District Forum has
erred in holding that STFI coverage is not included in the said
policy. It is further argued ... observing that the
complainant has not paid the premium for the STFI coverage. The
learned District Forum ought to have considered the fact that
