after handing over the draft to
the complainant, the applicants got the said demand draft
cancelled whereas the demand draft was in the name ... effect that
now neither he would stop the payment nor he would get the
draft cancelled. It was alleged that again the said draft
counsel for the petitioners has the demand
draft ready for the amount alleged to have been stopped payment
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1704/2017 ... Learned counsel for the private respondent refused to
accept the demand draft, as the mediation proceedings have
already failed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor states that
original cheque, they issued instructions of "stop payment" to their banker and again obtained another draft bearing No.178608, dt.05.02.2016
further stated that inadvertently the Insurance company directed concerned banks to stop payment of both sets of cheques. Being outraged, the Respondent/Complainant filed ... Respondent/Complainant received two fresh Demand Drafts in lieu of two cheques against which stop payment advice was made by the Revisionist. It is also
Aggarwal adviced
Daya Nand Singh not to proceed. He drafted a letter for stopping of
payment of abovesaid cheques on behalf of Daya Nand Singh
that he had lost the draft. Further
that, in such circumstances, Smt. Amrit Kaur proceeded to issue stop
payment instructions to the bank in Hong ... Kaur Sethi requested the
banker namely Fortis Bank to stop the payment. Accordingly, no
payment was made to the father of the plaintiffs. Even otherwise
complainant‟s husband on
06.06.2012 and the reason assigned was "payment stopped by the
drawer". The third cheque dated 25.05.2012 was also returned ... Bank within the stipulated period were
returned unpaid as the payment was "stopped by the drawer". It also
stands admitted that an amount
complainant‟s husband on
06.06.2012 and the reason assigned was "payment stopped by the
drawer". The third cheque dated 25.05.2012 was also returned ... Bank within the stipulated period were
returned unpaid as the payment was "stopped by the drawer". It also
stands admitted that an amount
case of the respondent that
alongwith the reply, a draft of Rs. 2323.20 bearing no. 052952, 110024045
drawn on PNB, GKI, New Delhi ... stopped accepting the payment through
cheque, the tenant deposited the rent in the Court. In reply to the notice of
demand, the demand draft
63, Moons Technologies Limited ... vs Union Of India & 10 Others on 4 December, 2017
