Delhi Higher Judicial
Service, is aggrieved by the remarks and strictures which have
been passed by the High Court of Delhi against him. According ... order but he was not justified in passing totally
unmerited and undeserved strictures and remarks against the
appellant.
22. In Kashi Nath Roy v. State
acquitted by the Trial Court. It is also
submitted that before passing strictures, the concerned officers
should have been heard and given an opportunity ... question
of proper investigation, delay etc. require indepth and detailed
scrutiny. The strictures regarding the investigation are justified and
proper. It will be appropriate
this very case in which
various benches of this Court has passed strictures against the
petitioner holding him guilty of not only abusing the process ... vide order dated 17.01.2020, wherein, his
Lordship was please to pass strictures against the petitioner
after observing as under:-
"27. I have no hesitation
condemned without being heard. The prejudicial effect on
somebody against whom a stricture is passed cannot be
assessed only in terms of the immediate damage ... judge must be wary of such
cascading effect of any statement/stricture made by him
while delivering judgment."
19. After hearing the submissions made
Trial
Court erred in placing reliance on the photos to pass
strictures against the petitioner and find fault with the
investigation done by petitioner ... that the court may not be justified in making adverse
remarks/passing strictures against a person unless it
is necessary for the disposal
Constitution of India, the petitioner
has prayed for expunging adverse remarks and strictures made against him by
the Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti in its judgment ... trial Court, while disposing off the criminal case,
amount to passing serious strictures against the petitioner, who at that relevant
time, was posted as Superintendent
well-known principles and traditions of a democratic State where strictures are passed by a Court of law they are no challenged by the executive ... make some comments in one of my decisions.
I frequently passed strictures against the investigaing officers. The observations made by me in the case
deciding the revision, the learned single Judge made certain
remarks and passed strictures against the appellant. Being aggrieved by
those remarks and observations, the appellant ... learned single
Judge of the High Court was not justified in passing strictures against
the appellant to which reference has been made
Public Prosecutor and in the said application he has prayed
that the strictures which are passed against him by the
learned Sessions Judge
need to be expunged. He has characterised the observations as 'adverse strictures'. The three contentions are :-
(i) the adverse strictures were not justified ... application for bail. Apart from the above, there are no adverse strictures passed by me against the applicant in either of the two paras quoted
