year 2006, he was posted at Durgapur Post Office,
Katihar as Sub Postmaster and consequent upon closure of the said
Post Office and transfer
Madhubani.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna.
2. The Post Master General (North), Bihar Circle ... Madhubani Division, Madhubani.
4. The Inspector Post, Madhubani West, Sub-Division, Madhubani.
5. The Sub-Postmaster Pandaul
District - Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna.
2. The Director of Postal Services, Patna Regiona ... Deshri, District - Vaishali.
5. The Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, East Sub-Division, Hajipur.
6. Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad @ Ravi Shankar Singh
Delhi
2. The Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna
3. The Assistant Director (Staff), O/o the Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle,
Patna ... Post Offices, East Champaran Division, Motihari
6. The Inspector of Posts, East Sub Division, Motihari
.... .... Respondents/Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajiv Ranjan Prasad, Son of Late
Secretary - cum - D.G. Department of Posts, New Delhi
2. The Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna
3. Post Master General, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur ... Post offices, Saharsa Division, Saharsa
5. The Assistant Postal Superintendent, Supaul Sub - Division, (Saharsa Postal
Division), Supaul
6. The Sub - Divisional inspector of Post offices
Samastipur, Assistant Superintendent, Post (BD) in the Office of
the Chief Postmaster General, Patna and presently posted as Deputy Chief Post
Master, Patna ... Assistant Director (Recruitment) Department of Posts, O/o the Chief
Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna
5. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Samastipur Division.
.... .... Respondents- Respondents
Delhi.
2. The Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna.
3. The Director of Postal Services (Hq), O/o the Chief Postmaster General, Bihar
Circle, Patna ... 19350 of 2015 dt.12-01-2016
2/3
the matter is sub-judice before the Tribunal. However, the challenge
before this Court being