review power by criminal courts. In Grindlays Bank Ltd. (supra), it was observed that review can be distinguished between ?procedural review? and ?substantive review ... review power by criminal courts. In Grindlays Bank Ltd. (supra), it was observed that review can be distinguished between ?procedural review? and ?substantive review
substantive review and, therefore, the application is not maintainable, is illegal, as the review sought by the petitioner was not a substantive review ... different considerations arise on review. The expression 'review' is used in two distinct senses, namely, (1) a procedural review which is either inherent
categories of review, namely procedural review and review on merits. It has been argued that the Court clearly held that while procedural review ... procedural review and a review on merits. In that context, the Court observed as follows:
Furthermore, different considerations arise on review. The expression review
which will justify a power of review in the event of procedural errors. Undoubtedly, a review where a substantive right is not created, specifically ... disturbed in a review. As held earlier, at the highest, there can be a procedural review, but not a substantive review under the scheme
otherwise did not confer any right of a substantive review on the adjudicatory authorities constituted under that enactment. The State in purported exercise ... that no provision of the 1927 Act grants a power of substantive review on the Appellate Authority. The power to undertake a substantive review
order on merits which renders it to be an application for substantive review.
In reference to this context, it is relevant to note that some ... substantive review on merits. Thus, in the absence of any statutory power to review, the prescribed authority has no authority of law to substantively review
review upon the authority, a review application was not maintainable. The review application filed by the respondent no.2 was not a procedural review, inasmuch ... substantive review available to the Deputy Labour Commissioner, he had no jurisdiction to pass the order upon the review application. Neither the review application
substantive review on merit and thus in absence of statutory power to review, the Prescribed Authority has no authority under law to substantively review ... nature of procedural review rather than substantive nature. It is well settled that the power of substantive review is not exercisable by any Court, Tribunal
issue as to whether the RLC had a power of substantive review would shade into the background and would cease to have any practical significance ... clear distinction in law between a procedural review and a substantive review. The power of substantive review has to be conferred by a specific statutory
substantive review and not procedural review as the power of procedural review is inherent in every Court or Tribunal, whereas substantive review ... other words, procedural review. That was, therefore, not a case of substantive review, for the learned Judges to have taken the view, which has been
