Susetha vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors on 8 August, 2006
Equivalent citations: AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT ... Sinha , Dalveer Bhandari
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 3418 of 2006
PETITIONER:
SUSETHA
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF TAMIL NADU and ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/2006
Susetha vs The Union Of India on 28 July, 2010
Author: K.K.Sasidharan
Bench: K.K.Sasidharan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... Petition No.30725 of 2008
and M.P.No.7 of 2009
Susetha ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Union of India,
rep.by its Secretary
Susetha vs K. Balakrishnan on 24 February, 2025
Author: J.Nisha Banu
Bench: J.Nisha Banu , S.Srimathy
W.A(MD)No.2689 ... 18637, 18639 and 18640 of 2024
Mrs.K.Susetha ... Appellant
vs.
1. K. Balakrishnan
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Dindigul Revenue Division,
Dindigul District
Ponnu Chetty & Palainammal vs Mrs.Susetha Badruswamy on 25 November, 2016
Author: R.Subramanian
Bench: R.Subramanian
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... Dhanapal
4.S.Srinivasan
5.Jai Santhosh ... Appellants
Vs.
1.Mrs.Susetha Badruswamy
2.Siva Badruswamy
3.S.Jayalakshmi
4.S.Vishnupriya ... Respondents
This Appeal
subsequent decision reported in 2006 (6) SCC 543 ( Susetha Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others ) the Hon'ble Supreme Court explained its decision ... case dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Susetha case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the correctness of the Division
after taking into account the
judgment of this Court in Susetha vs. Union of India [W.P.No.30725 of
http://www.judis ... Advocate General cited the judgment of this
Court in the case of Susetha –vs- Union of India [W.P.No.30725 of 2008]
decided
after taking into account the
judgment of this Court in Susetha vs. Union of India [W.P.No.30725 of
2008] decided on 28.07.2010, clearly ... Advocate General cited the judgment of this
Court in the case of Susetha –vs- Union of India [W.P.No.30725 of 2008]
decided
Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2006) 6
SCC 543 in Susetha vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others had held as follows:
“Held
Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2006) 6
SCC 543 in Susetha vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others had held as follows:
“Held
Revenue Divisional Officer,
Dindigul Revenue Division,
Dindigul.
2.K.Susetha
3.R.Jaya
4.Senthil Murugan ... Respondents
(R4 is suo motu impleaded vide order dated ... maintenance by the petitioner is meant for joint maintenance of the
mother/Susetha as well as the brother/Senthil Murugan. This figure shall be
constant
