Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

pointed out that the First Information Report itself was a suspicious document and possibly could not have been recorded at the time when

sale was absolutely false, that Ex. P. 5 was an entirely suspicious document, that its genuineness had not been proved and that, as the document ... which the suit was laid was an inchoate and suspicious document and it had not been registered, the remedy of the respondent ought to have

document itself which tend to show that the document was not written up before that signature was affixed and that it is a very suspicious

Will executed by Ramabadra Naidu should be treated as a suspicious document is legally sustainable in view of the evidence ... Will executed by Ramabadra Naidu should be treated as a suspicious document is legally sustainable in view of the evidence

those circumstances, the Trial Court found that the Will is a suspicious document and accordingly, arrived a conclusion that such a suspicious Will cannot ... perusal of the document as well as the deposition of the witnesses revealed that there are suspicious circumstances with reference to the Will produced

hearing of the suit. 11. After the amendment, Order XIII reads: Original documents to be produced at (or) before the Settlement of Issues ... object of new Rule 1 is to prevent late production of suspicious documents and to curtail the power of the Court to receive the documentary

registration of the Will, will not tag the documents under the suspicious document category, as the evidence of witnesses are prone to minor contradictions ... under :- “52. Whereas execution of any other document can be proved by proving the writings of the document or the contents of it as also

prayed for after holding that the Will dated 23.06.1991 is a suspicious document and that the defendant has not proved the due execution

documents upon which the Labour Court had relied was a suspicious document; and the High Court went on to find that no demand had been

document. It is only a Xerox copy. Therefore, it is the suspicious document. Hence, strict compliance of Section 42 of the Act, is not correct