falsely claimed and later obtained compensation from Government in respect of Tauzi Nos. 4498/2 and 4169 under Tarapur and Sheikhpura Ariari Anchals. The said ... Nathun San and others were entitled to compensation only in respect of tauzi No. 4498/2, and not in respect of tauzi
Sahay Singh, allege that they own 7 dams & odd share in tauzi No. 2542 in village Kendua, which has been included in Register ... Sahay, owned 7 dams 3 kauris 12 bauris & odd share in tauzi No. 2542 in mauza Kendua & he was in possession
respondents, six mortgage-bonds hypothecating his proprietary shares in different tauzis as detailed below :
(1) dated 11-5-35 for Rs. 17,000 in respect ... tauzis Nos. 20805 and 9710;
(2) dated 27-5-34 for Rs. 33,000 in respect of tauzis
profits in respect of 134 bighas of land in village Pursotimpur in tauzi No. 11840 in the district of Muzaffarpur. All the plaintiff ... Singh defendant No. 40, who thus acquired 12 annas patti in the tauzi. By that time, about 32 bighas of land had become cultivable
PATNA 555(2)
JUDGMENT
Chapman, J.
1. A revenue paying estate, bearing Tauzi No. 4601, was held by co-sharers. Some had opened seprate accounts ... have not separated, stated in the term of a share of the Tauzi number. A purchaser of the ijmali share takes the estate
pokhta' share of 'milkiat' bearing 'Tauzi' No. 699 and 6 p. 'pokhta' share of 'milkiat' bearing ... Tauzi No. 698 in 'mauza' Madhubani, 'pargana' Mahsi. These 'tauzis' are described as having an annual rent roll
dhurs in village Bhagatpur Diana and Paharpur in the same tauzi, and 18 bighas 15 kathas and 7 dhurs of raiyati kaimi jot land situate ... village Shahpur under tauzi No. 632. The total of this schedule came to 121 bighas 11 kathas and 18 dhurs. Usufructuary and simple mortgage bonds
joint possession with the defendants. Three of these estates, Akbarpur Rani, Tauzi No. 1213, Srikishunpur, Tauzi, No. 9190 and Mathura Sri Ram, Tauzi ... that she was putting forward a claim to proprietorship in the tauzis. The Subordinate Judge found that the plaintiff had no joint possession with Musammat
appellant is the proprietor of three estates, Umarpur Diara, tauzi No. 1455, Sarwanpur, tauzi No. 14229, and Belsipah, tauzi No. 14230, borne on the revenue ... Bengal Act IX [9] of 1880), cess was assessed on tauzi No. 1455 on an asset value of Rs. 76,428-16-0, which included
others were proprietors of eight annas share in Mahal Mordih Kalaunde bearing Tauzi No. 3195/1 in pargana maher, Thana Fatehpur in the district ... Mahal comprised of four villages. On 13-1-1947 the Tauzi (which, hereafter in this judgment, will mean the eight annas share of the recorded
