evidence placed on record discloses that
there was a serious tenancy dispute between the
deceased Kallappa and one person by name
Eshwarappa, Channaveerappa, Shirasappa. What ... dispute was a collusive dispute between the
deceased Kallappa, Channaveerappa and Eshwarappa.
16. This Court is unable to accept the same as
the tenancy dispute
been
long drawn tenancy litigation between the parties. As
per the submission of learned counsel for accused, the
tenancy dispute is still pending ... cross-examination of PW-
1 is concentrated on the tenancy dispute pending
between accused No.1 and PW-4.
13. The evidence
parties could be decided only after final
adjudication of tenancy dispute. If the plaintiffs herein
succeed in the pending dispute then the question of
defendant ... present litigation. Till the final adjudication
of the writ appeals in tenancy dispute, even if any order or
decree passed by the civil Court does
parties could be decided only after final
adjudication of tenancy dispute. If the plaintiffs herein
succeed in the pending dispute then the question of
defendant ... present litigation. Till the final adjudication
of the writ appeals in tenancy dispute, even if any order or
decree passed by the civil Court does
necessary implication. It cannot be disputed that there is no provision in the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act which specifically confers jurisdiction ... Civil Court had jurisdiction to decide the points in dispute including the question of tenancy. Section 32 of that Act is substantially a reproduction
take into consideration relevant material in deciding the issue of tenancy disputed before it.
Documents subsequent to 1-3-1974 should be construed as evidence
take into consideration relevant material in deciding the issue of tenancy disputed before it".
Further, the learned Counsel for the petitioners placed his reliance ... tenant, in the absence of proof that an agreement of tenancy was entered into after the expiry of the period. Hence, the question of applying
that 'the applicant is a tenant'.
7. It is not disputed before us that the Tribunal has to decide the contest between ... disputed before us by the learned 1st Additional Government Advocate that the Tahsildar has no jurisdiction to decide the question of disputed tenancy
buildings on the land in question is
not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that the
inamdar did not make any application under ... proceeding before the Land Tribunal is only to
resolve a dispute regarding tenancy, in other words,
whether the inam land was tenanted
material to
establish tenancy. It was submitted when even according to GS
Sathish, there was oral tenancy. Riyaz Ulla Khan had disputed
existence of tenancy ... ground that tenancy claimed was oral and even after plea of
dispute about tenancy, neither rent receipt or
acknowledgement of payment of rent signed
