need for
him to repair the plaint
schedule houseqjagfwto let out
M33"
different portions to other
tenants."
16. on the above reasoning
state. It required Immediate repairs and
the lessee was permitted to carry out necessary repairs,
additions, alterations and if the lease is lint rencwd ... himseit. The tenant
the first defendant into possession. Narayana Hebbar
was forced to accept tile first defendant as a tenant and
years
leased the proper
brothers
it continued to reside in the said premises as tenants.
.' for dismissal of the petition.
6
Subsequently as aforesaid, the eviction petition ... averments
made in xup a contention that
there Vyas landlord and tenant and it
was the respondents that the
sehed'u'1e.prem
tenant under the
reisponvdiient and the respondent threatened him to vacate the
Zpreniwiises and the respondent did not open the door when the
mtelephone repairers
Kum Shubha @ Shubhashankar vs State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010
Author: N.Ananda
Bench
H C Iyengar S/O H Appanna Iyegar vs Smt M C Vimala Narasimhan on
Ashok Jethanand Jotwani, vs Kishor S/O.Tejanathsa Pawar, on 25 October, 2010
Author: Aravind
Varija vs Lalitha Manjunath on 14 September, 2010
Bench: K.L.Manjunath , B.Manohar
I
H C Iyengar S/O H Appanna Iyegar vs Smt M C Vimala Narasimhan on
Arun Bhaurao Kakatkar By Lrs ... vs Ashok Rudrappa Chanavan on 28 October, 2010
Author: Aravind