Murphy India Ltd. @
PPA No. 165/2016 (Old No. 34/13) Sh. Anil Aggarwal Vs. LIC of India AND
PPA No. 177/2016 ... dated 23.05.1996,
the tenancy in respect of the demised premises was terminated
PPA No. 165/2016 (Old No. 34/13) Sh. Anil Aggarwal
does indicate
that the landlord is entitled to terminate the
(PPA - 18 & 19 of 2011) (Page 13 of 24)
tenancy by giving 15 days ... that a tenancy can be terminated under Section 106
of the TP Act and once such tenancy is terminated then the
lawful tenant also become
lease from month to month, terminable, on
the part of either lessor or lessee by giving fifteen
days notice.
PPA No.07/2020 ... issue regarding the tenancy
in the year 2015 and subsequently terminated the
PPA No.07/2020 M/s Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Life Insurance
developing the demised premises as an
underground bus terminal to be connected to Old Delhi Railway
PPA No.4/2022 M/s Radhey Mohan Club ... project of Bus Terminal, in that event the Club is ready to
fully cooperate in the construction of underground bus terminal only
terminal was filed along with
the petition. It is submitted that the demised premises does not come
under so called underground Bus Terminal. The Club ... project of Bus Terminal, in that event the Club is ready
to fully cooperate in the construction of underground bus terminal
only
terminal was filed along with
the petition. It is submitted that the demised premises does not come
under so called underground Bus Terminal. The Club ... project of Bus Terminal, in that event the Club is ready to
fully cooperate in the construction of underground bus terminal only
Hence, the appellant became a tenant on month to month basis by
PPA No.57/08 etc. Page 7of 24
holding over. Vide notice dated ... terminating the notice were not only duly proved but were even not
disputed on behalf of the appellants during the course of arguments. The
PPA
habitual
defaulter and his tenancy had been terminated by means of registered
PPA No.05/10. Page 3of 18
AD notice dated 7/4/1986 ... period of lease."
PPA No.05/10. Page 7of 18
The said notice stated that tenancy stood terminated with effect from
favour. It was contended that Civil Writ Petition No. 3285/1992 was
PPA No. 7514
Devi Dayal Vs. DDA & Ors. page ... dated 27.05.93 dismissed the
said writ petition holding that the lease stood terminated in the year 1966 and
the same had not been extended beyond
period of one year was executed between the
(PPA Nos.23/24/25/26 of 2011 (Page 4 of 19)
petitioner Corporation and respondent ... ever executed
between the parties. Respondent Corporation sent a notice
dated 30.09.2006 terminating the tenancy w.e.f. midnight of
31.10.2006. Thereafter a notice dated
