Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.81 seconds)

Rakesh vs State on 28 April, 2011

Appellants in the Court by the two public witnesses. Refusal to participate in TIP would lead to an inference that if the Appellants had joined ... could be justification on the part of an accused to refuse to join a TIP for either he or his photograph had been shown
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Maya Chanchal vs State on 18 August, 2011

Identification Proceedings (TIP) were arranged; Appellant Lal Babu Ram was correctly identified by Smt. Phool Batra in the TIP. The other Appellants refused to participate ... Shankar since the very beginning (i.e. at the time of refusing TIP) had informed the Metropolitan Magistrate that they were taken to house
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - G P Mittal - Full Document
1