attained finality as the delinquent in the said case had
refused TIP and the Review Application is stated to be
pending against the said order
enquiry. In this case, the very fact
that the appellant had refused TIP invokes more than a
reasonable presumption of guilt against him. That
enforcement agencies. The very
fact that the appellant had refused TIP has raised a more
than a reasonable a reasonable presumption of guilt against
above
complaint at the instance of accused Kiran Kalia. TIP
proceedings were conducted. Accused Ajay refused to
take part in the TIP proceedings. The complainant
Vimal Kumar (Inspector) No.D-1/104 vs Commissioner Of Police on 28 April, 2010
Ajab Singh vs Delhi Police on 12 December, 2025
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench,
New
Vashist Kumar vs Comm. Of Police on 20 April, 2018
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench
Narendeer Singh vs M/O Railways on 27 March, 2019
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
S K Kaushik vs Delhi Development Authority Delhi on 28 January, 2020
1
OA 904