Anand vs Mrs.Satiswari on 8 October, 2021
TOS. No.18 of 2015 & C.S. No.325 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Pronounced on:27.09.2024
CORAM:
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
TOS.No.18 of 2015
and
C.S. No.325 of 2013
TOS
Ramadoss vs M.Sarada Devi on 1 April, 2021
TOS. No.10 to 12 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved ... Pronounced on: 30.10.2024
CORAM:
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
TOS.Nos.10, 11 & 12 of 2016
M.Ramadoss
.. Petitioner/Plaintiff
probate and the said OP was
converted into TOS No.29 of 2009 and the same is pending before this
Court. In the said proceedings ... partition suit in C.S.No.340 of 2006 and the TOS pending from the
year 2009, he has filed the instant complaint
PONGIAPPAN
T.O.S.Nos.10 of 2013 and 64 of 2016
TOS No.10 of 2013 (OP No.920 of 2005)
C.Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner ... judis/
T.O.S.Nos.10 of 2013 and 64 of 2016
TOS No.64 of 2016 (OP No.723 of 2005)
C.Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner
PONGIAPPAN
T.O.S.Nos.10 of 2013 and 64 of 2016
TOS No.10 of 2013 (OP No.920 of 2005)
C.Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner ... judis/
T.O.S.Nos.10 of 2013 and 64 of 2016
TOS No.64 of 2016 (OP No.723 of 2005)
C.Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner
Batch Page 24 of 29
// 25 //
deployed as RTOs, the TOs had to go through training, and they
had to have five years of regular ... Thereafter, when on 9th August 1999, an ACP scheme was
floated, the TOs/ RTOs who were not permitted them that benefit
since their conversion
Lines epee '
es fm ch Wh ap whe - ry en tos ... oped oo tos Sie peal hog we oe a "hee he
om Sood
deceased first defendant. As per order of
this Court dated 30.07.2020)
...Defendants
TOS.NO.29 of 2018
1.A.S.Sethuraman
2.A.S.Narayanan ... hereunder.
e)Directing to pay the cost of the suit.
Prayer in TOS No.29 of 2018:-
The petition filed under sections
deceased first defendant. As per order of
this Court dated 30.07.2020)
...Defendants
TOS.NO.29 of 2018
1.A.S.Sethuraman
2.A.S.Narayanan ... hereunder.
e)Directing to pay the cost of the suit.
Prayer in TOS No.29 of 2018:-
The petition filed under sections
probate of Will, which was later converted into TOS and was
dismissed. After the dismissal, the first defendant maneuvered to get rid of the
sisters ... judis/
S.A.No.643 of 2016
party to the said TOS the judgment of the Court is not binding upon him. He
caused
