Track Consignment Report of the notices issued shows that
Respondent No.12, Md. Mahfuz Ansari has refused the notice on
13.01.2025; Respondent ... address; as regards Respondent No.20, Parwej Alam, the Track
Consignment Report shows "Item Bagged" which means that it has
not been served
Track Consignment Report of the notices issued shows that
Respondent No.12, Md. Mahfuz Ansari has refused the notice on
13.01.2025; Respondent ... address; as regards Respondent No.20, Parwej Alam, the Track
Consignment Report shows "Item Bagged" which means that it has
not been served
appeared thereafter or even today. The
2
track consignment of the notice sent to the Applicant on 07.12.2024
shows 'Item Delivered' and, therefore
Respondent No.3, Central Pollution Control Board, has filed the
track consignment report which shows service of notice on Ms.
Geeta Devi on 13.12.2024, therefore
Application as well as annexures thereto.
2. We find that the track consignment, which is annexed at page no.
101 of the paper book ... related to Respondent No. 2 and track
consignment regarding Respondent No. 12 is annexed at page no. 107 of
the paper book, show that
proceeded ex parte against these respondents.
7. It appears from the track consignment that the weight of the
consignment shown is just 10 grams, which
appeared.
4. Affidavit of service has been filed by the Applicant. Track
Consignment Report shows service upon Respondent No.1.
1
(Final order ... Appeared. Affidavit of the service has been filed by the Applicant,
consignment tracking report of which shows service upon the
Respondent
been sent to him by the office of the Tribunal
and track consignment report also shows delivery of notice
proof of service i.e. track consignment has been filed. Therefore, we
find that the service of notice on above respondents is sufficient.
[NPJ] Page
pursuance of the order of this
Court dated 27.11.2024. The track consignment of the notice
shows the same to have been delivered to the Applicant
