RJIL in November, 2016
(registered as Case No. 95 of 2016).
Proceedings before TRAI:
12) As the matter was with the TRAI as well ... delay the provision of POIs, as in the case of RJIL.
However, the TRAI does not have the power to penalize for past
conduct which
some provision for other regulators, which is not available in this TRAI case, and nobody has prevented them from bringing the same legislation ... same bar is there in the case of the Chairman as in the case of the Insurance Regulatory Authority. Then, under the Airport Economic Regulatory
some provision for other regulators, which is not available in this TRAI case, and nobody has prevented them from bringing the same legislation ... same bar is there in the case of the Chairman as in the case of the Insurance Regulatory Authority. Then, under the Airport Economic Regulatory
relevant market of GSM cellular service providers in India,
therefore, no case has been made out against them for infringement of
Section ... parties viz; a)
jurisdiction of CCI in this case as it pertains to the jurisdiction of TRAI; b) the
applicability
complaint is required to be made to TRAI and it is the
function of TRAI to ensure compliance of terms & conditions ... Regulations of the TRAI. It has been
stated that the answering opposite party has been strictly
complying with the TRAI Regulations and offers the STBs
RJIL fell squarely within the
scope of regulatory powers of TRAI and TRAI was required to
determine it. A Controller does not regulate the exercise ... cannot be equated to that as performed by the TRAI.
56. The expertise of TRAI in the field of telecommunications is
materially different than
jurisdiction only after conclusion
of proceedings and TRAI returned its findings. He
submitted that in the instant case, Enforcement Directorate
is already investigating the matter ... progress.
51. In response, Smt. Madhavi Diwan rightly
submitted that TRAI is a sectoral regulator and in view of
the issues involved
ratio laid down in Bharti Airtel
case (cited supra) has been relied upon.
26. In the case of Monsanto Holdings Pvt. Ltd., and others ... case or to drop the case.
53. With reference to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court,
in the case of Bharti Airtel
exit barrier is concerned, in some cases the
equipment is sold on outright sale basis whereas in some cases it is given on rent ... TRAI, BIS or the
government and has got to be considered by the Commission.
-16-
23. The eleventh argument advanced is that as TRAI considers
TRAI.
25. Further, OP-1 has averred that the carriage and placement fee are also under the
TRAI's purview. Under the extant TRAI ... case of dominance is made out
against OP-2. Also, no case of collective dominance can be made out under the
Act.
Case
