withdraw the appeal. Respondent No. 2 has made this Civil Application for transposing him as the appellant in case the appellant is permitted to withdraw ... appellant has vehemently opposed the application made by respondent No 2 for transposing him as the appellant. In order to appreciate the rival contentions raised
substitution,
condonation of delay and setting aside abetment and transposed the
respondent no.2 to appellant.
2. Sans details, the short fact of the case ... dated 15.9.2008. By the said order, the respondent no.2 was also transposed
as appellant.
3. The present respondent challenged the order dated
Petition filed under Order 23 Rule 1-A C.P.C to transpose the Third Plaintiff as Third Defendant. Plaintiffs ... this Petition under Order 23 Rule 1-A C.P.C to transpose the Third Plaintiff as Third Defendant. The Revision Petitioners have alleged that
defendant No.3 (who was originally plaintiff No.4 and
later transposed as defendant No.3) filed objection to the memo stating that he
alone ... Defendant
No.3 as I stated, is plaintiff No.4 who was transposed as defendant No.3 during
the pendency of proceeding in the trial
before this Court to transpose him as
appellant in the said A.S.No.768 of 1985 to prosecute the
appeal. According ... side of petitioner in the transpose application (2nd
defendant in the suit) and also marked documents as Exs.A-1
to A-12 apart from
appellant, which was arrayed as 10th defendant in the said suit, to transpose it as the third plaintiff ... 5301 of 2010 in C.S.No.686 of 2000 to transpose the appellant, who was arrayed as 10th defendant, as the third plaintiff
Bharath Kumar. V - Adv for
2
O.S.No.17613/2005
Transposed Plaintiff No.2]
[Transposed Plaintiff No.2 died
during pendency]
V/s
Defendants ... 707A, 12th Cross,
Vinayakanagar, HAL PO,
Bangalore-560 017.
(Now Transposed to Plaintiff No.2)
2. Mrs. Rita Saldanha,
D/o Late J. F Saldanha
filed under Order 23 Rule 1-A of C.P.C . To transpose the 2nd respondent ... filed under order 23 Rule 1A of Civil Procedure Code for transposing the 2nd respondent in C.M.P.No.2/2012
civil revision is by the plaintiff. It is directed against an order transposing the intervener-defendant, Nanda Prasad Tripathi, as plaintiff in the suit ... appears that thereafter Nanda Prasad Tripathi filed an application for transposing him to the category of plaintiff and transposing the original plaintiff to the category
invest the funds of the University in or upon such securities and transpose any investment from time to time in such manner
