respondent
P.S.Deivaraj, seeking leave of this Court to transpose him as the Criminal Revision
Case. Also, to convert it into Criminal Appeal against ... Sessions Court. In all those cases, the
complainant must file a transpose petition and
the Registry must convert the same as Criminal
Appeals by showing
sixth respondent Vijay Kumar Sanghi filed an application to transpose him as second appellant. On 4-11-2000 appellant Mahendra Kumar Sanghi has filed ... Rules on 2nd March, 2000 with a prayer that he may be transposed as second appellant along with Shri M.K. Sanghi or in alternate
Order XXIII Rule 1 - A r/w
Section 151 of CPC to transpose himself as Plaintiff No.2 in the suit ... Section 151 of the Civil
Procedure Code seeking leave to transpose as plaintiff No.2. According to
Defendant No.10, the plaintiff and the defendant
Order XXIII Rule 1 - A r/w
Section 151 of CPC to transpose himself as Plaintiff No.2 in the suit ... Section 151 of the Civil
Procedure Code seeking leave to transpose as plaintiff No.2. According to
Defendant No.10, the plaintiff and the defendant
herein) filed on behalf of respondent No. 3 for transposing him as appellant.
2. An election petition under Section 36 of the Act was filed ... Hariram, the (sic)defeatedkcandidate on January 6, 1983 that he may be transposed as the appellant in place of respondent No. 3. The Court
Immediately thereafter second plaintiff filed an application for
getting himself transposed as 5th defendant and said
application came to be allowed on 03.09.2003 and records ... trial court would indicate that second plaintiff was transposed
as 5th defendant on 03.09.2003. Though original plaint has
not been amended as was required typed
plaintiff
abandons and/or withdraws the suit, any defendant can apply for transposing
itself as plaintiff and to continue the suit. The Court ... other words, only in suits where the defendants
claim to be transposed have interest identical with the interest of the
plaintiffs can transposition be considered
Impugned Order‟], whereby the prayer of the
Defendant No.8 to be transposed as Plaintiff No.2 has been rejected
by the learned Single Judge ... Court‟s plenary power
under Order I Rule 10(2) to transpose parties at any stage of the
proceedings to ensure effective adjudication
Gurugram, whereby his application
filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for transposing him as co-appellant,
has been dismissed.
2. Parties ... have filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10
CPC for transposing their names in the array of appellants. The said
application was contested
which the application of the respondent
no.1 for transposing himself as well as the petitioner no.2
company as plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit ... which the application of the respondent no.1 for transposing
himself as well as the petitioner no.2 company as plaintiffs in
Regular Civil Suit
