shop owners
engaged in dummy sales, cross-movement of stock, and redistributed
turnover to adjacent shops, with no demand for vacant notified stocks.
27. Report ... further supports the
petitioners' (accused) claim that sales decreased during the year 2014-15
compared to 2013-14, justifying the removal of the provision
shop owners
engaged in dummy sales, cross-movement of stock, and redistributed
turnover to adjacent shops, with no demand for vacant notified stocks.
27. Report ... further supports the
petitioners' (accused) claim that sales decreased during the year 2014-15
compared to 2013-14, justifying the removal of the provision
shop owners
engaged in dummy sales, cross-movement of stock, and redistributed
turnover to adjacent shops, with no demand for vacant notified stocks.
27. Report ... further supports the
petitioners' (accused) claim that sales decreased during the year 2014-15
compared to 2013-14, justifying the removal of the provision
