This application has been filed for correction of
typographical error in the order dated 06.08.2015 and the
judgment dated 01.08.2019, wherein ... perusal of the records, I find that there is a
typographical error to the aforesaid effect. Accordingly, in the
order dated
JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN
SINGH)
5 19-01-2023 There is typographical error in the order dated
03.01.2023 wherein 'learned Additional Session Judge-2nd,
Nawada ... place of 'learned Additional Sessions
Judge-7th, Nawada. The said typographic error has apparently
occurred because of the typographic error in the prayer portion
been rightly pointed out by the office that there
is a typographical error in the order dated 22.12.2022, wherein
'19.10.2023' has been typed
slip filed on behalf of the
appellant for removal of certain typographical error in the order
dated 11.10.2022, on 13.10.2022. On 13.10.2022, it was pointed ... same was withdrawn on 11.10.2022. There
being typographical error in the order dated 11.10.2022, the
appellant was not released on the strength of the said
appellant submits at the very
outset that there is a typographical error in paragraph-11 of this
application, wherein 09.04.2015 has been typed in place
JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN
SINGH)
5 03-04-2023 There is a typographical error in the order dated
06.02.2023, wherein the appellant has been typed
typographical error in the order dated 02.02.2023. The final
hearing of these matters had concluded on 02.02.2023 and,
accordingly, the appeal was to be listed
typographical error in the order dated 02.02.2023. The final
hearing of these matters had concluded on 02.02.2023 and,
accordingly, the appeal was to be listed
appellants admits
that it has occurred because of inadvertent typographical error
which had crept in the memo of appeal itself. He submits that
the said
appearing on behalf of the
petitioner accepts that there is a typographical error in this
Court's order dated 27.09.2023 to the extent amount
