Manas Kundu
Mr. Saikat Chatterjee
... for the State
Certain inadvertent typographical errors crept into the order dated May 25,
2018 when this matter was moved ... records in
this Court free from inadvertent errors especially when I am satisfied that the
errors are typographical, clerical and wholly in advertent.
Accordingly
moved. Since the Municipality itself a
petitioner, it is a clear typographical error. Let that paragraph starting from the
words "The municipality had been
Appellants.
Although on an earlier occasion, some of the
typographical errors appearing in the judgment dated
December 22, 2017 was corrected but subsequently, it
appears ... that there are further two typographical errors
which are required to be corrected.
In the operative portion of the last paragraph at
page
attention of this Court is drawn towards the typographical error which
took place in the order dated October 09, 2018 and the same is corrected
that section. It seems
that such omission has occasioned due to typographical
error. However, section 215 Cr.P.C. specifically provides
that no error
hopeless
attempt to obtain an advantage of a mere typographical error. The
evidence of all the witnesses and the exhibits prove beyond reasonable
doubt that
behalf of the petitioners, leave is granted to
correct the typographical error in the cause title so far as the description of the
respondent
dated April 27, 2016 holding that
there is no arithmetical or typographical error in the said order.
This Court also does not find any such
even by way of review excepting for
correcting arithmetical mistake or typographical error. In support
of his contention he relies upon the statutory provisions
Petitioner
Inspector-in-Charge (Kaliyaganj Police Station)
...... For the State
Inadvertent typographical error had crept into the order dated
26.03.2018.
In the first paragraph
