directions on February 14, 2017 as according to it, a
typographical error was noticed in the said judgment. On this
day, following order was passed ... This matter has been listed today for directions. A
typographical error was noticed post delivery this judgment
dated 24.12.2016 in the concluding portion. The error
behalf of the
respondent/accused; also for correction of alleged typographical error in
the crossexamination of the revisionist/complainant recorded ... para of the crossexamination of the
petitioner was clearly a typographical error. It is further averred that the
income tax returns and documents relating
complaint and in his
examination-in-chief on account typographical error. It is
true that, the address mentioned in the cause title of the
complaint ... Though, there is some typographical error in cheque
number in the complaint and sworn statement is mentioned
as cheque "No.75240
misc. appeal is maintainable."
3. There appears to be a typographical error in the last line of
paragraph 5 and the word
Satynarayan Nandkishor Pande vs Mr. Vinay Jagdishchandra Pande And Ors on 22 December, 2018
Equivalent
anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is a
typographical error in the heading of the order as in the concluding part
court on 05.09.2017. The petitioner is deriving the benefit of the
typographical error which has crept in the said order in para No. 6,
wherein
termed as DW-2 as well as DW-3 due to typographical
error.
No other defence witness was produced by the accused and thus
basis of its accusation were already mentioned, but due to some
typographical error its name was left to be written in the cause title
ought to have been 28.05.2014. It is a clerical and typographical error,
Pr
therefore, the petitioner submits that the order passed by the revisional ... place of 2014 is a clerical error.
The same typographical error can be corrected. The view expressed in
the case of " State
